|
Heads up! We have scanned the upcoming agenda for Fallbrook Union High. We found 5 items that need your immediate attention before the vote.
| HIGH CONCERN (LEVEL 9) |
|
$128k ‘Team-Building’ Contract Hidden in Consent Agenda
Buried in the Consent Agenda, Item XV.A.9 is a $128,000 contract with a vendor called ‘ANEW Project’ for ‘team-building, reflection, community-building, and data-collection experiences.’ The vendor’s purpose is to promote concepts like ‘belonging,’ ‘student voice,’ and ‘inclusive learning environments,’ which are common euphemisms for Social Emotional Learning (SEL) and DEI programming.
Recommended Action Plan
DEMAND TRANSPARENCY: Email the Board of Trustees (see the Official Agenda link for contact info): ‘I demand Consent Item XV.A.9 be pulled from the Consent Agenda for a separate discussion and roll-call vote. Who is the ANEW Project and what is in the ‘community-building’ curriculum they’re selling for $128,000? Verify this vendor before spending taxpayer dollars.’
💰 Impact: $128,000
|
| HIGH CONCERN (LEVEL 8) |
|
Board to Vote on Hidden Policy Changes from CSBA
Item XIV.D.2 is a vote to approve revised, new, and deleted board policies recommended by the California School Boards Association (CSBA). The district has not provided the text of these changes, asking the board and the public to approve them sight-unseen. CSBA is a major source of policies that undermine parental rights, particularly regarding gender identity and curriculum.
Recommended Action Plan
PACK THE ROOM: The board is voting on policy updates from the California School Boards Association (CSBA) without showing parents the text. Email the Board of Trustees (see the Official Agenda link for contact info): ‘Vote NO on Item XIV.D.2. Parents will not approve a blank check for policy changes that could strip our rights. Show us the text.’
💰 Impact: Reduced Parental Oversight
|
| NEEDS REVIEW (LEVEL 7) |
|
Over $4.3M in School Plans Push ‘Equity’ and ‘SEL’
Under Items XIV.B.3 and XIV.B.4, the district plans to spend a combined $4.3 million on School Plans for Student Achievement (SPSA) for Ivy High and Fallbrook High. These plans are filled with language about ‘social-emotional supports,’ ‘student connectedness,’ and ‘equitable access,’ signaling a shift from academic priorities to social programming.
Recommended Action Plan
DEMAND TRANSPARENCY: Email the Board of Trustees (see the Official Agenda link for contact info): ‘Regarding Items XIV.B.3 and XIV.B.4, I demand to know how the district will measure academic ROI on the $4.3 million being spent on non-academic programs. Taxpayer money should fund academics, not social programming.’
💰 Impact: $4,367,393.75
|
| ALERT (LEVEL 4) |
|
Job Description Creates Pathway for Outside Influence on Library Books
Under Item XIV.D.4, the revised job description for the Library and Media Services Technician adds a new duty: ‘Coordinate with SDCOE Librarian of Record for… literature selection and board recommendations, management of the Digital Content Portal, and curriculum development.’ This creates a formal channel for an unelected county official to influence which books and materials are purchased for our school libraries, bypassing direct parental oversight.
Recommended Action Plan
ASK THE QUESTION: Email the Board of Trustees (see the Official Agenda link for contact info): ‘Regarding Item XIV.D.4, who is the San Diego County Office of Education Librarian of Record, and what is their process for literature selection? Parents must have oversight of who influences our children’s library materials.’
💰 Impact: Loss of Local Control
|
|
✅ Wins to Defend
Good moves worth showing up to support so they stick.
|
| Win (LEVEL 2) |
|
District Models Parental Consent for Optional Program
The district is partnering with Coastline Academy to offer a free online driver’s education course under Item XV.A.6. Crucially, the district is making the program optional and requiring explicit parental consent only after parents are given the opportunity to review the third-party vendor’s data privacy policies. This is a positive example of respecting parental authority.
How to Lock It In
Show up to thank the Board for their handling of Item XV.A.6. This is a model for respecting parental authority, with clear opt-in and data transparency for third-party programs. Let’s get this on the record so it becomes standard practice.
✅ Why It Matters: Positive Precedent
|
|
|
“We do not co-parent with the government.”
Moms for Liberty is the nation’s largest grassroots organization fighting for parental rights. Through national members and local chapters, our work ensures parents, not the government or radical activists, make the decisions concerning the upbringing and education of their children.
JOIN THE FIGHT
Powered by Sentinel Engine |